Hello Arnie,

You may be interested in this:

http://vocuspr.com/vocuseu/Newsroom/ViewAttachment.aspx?SiteName=ResolutionNew&Entity=PRAsset&AttachmentType=F&EntityID=576255&AttachmentID=5eaa344f-20ce-4c7c-9077-7b0d1ee9bfba

Then again you may not.

YA

that ­link­ doesnt seem to be working YA

Thanks DBNO,

There was an unnecessary full stop at the end of the ­link­ which I have just very successfully deleted.

The above edit represents no small achievement for someone of my level of computer incompetence.

(YA wipes sweat from brow)

Cheers!

YA

Another lot of fantastic bedtime reading!

Excellent YoungAgain.

Thank you, I do always want the facts, all my posts are factual otherwise Resolution or the telly Tubbies would have taken legal action, and not wishing to tempt fate but March 2007 until now nothing has been done, quite possibly because it wouldn't stand it up in a court, and they are guilty ----FACT



Sorry I forgot to mention the Telly Tubbies did call the police and tried to allege harassment, they showed the coppers without predujudice letters.
All a bit of a waste of police time really because the police like me don't have a lot of time for corrupt solicitors who get "crimins off" after they have put their lives on the line to catch them in the first place.

You would have thought that a professional firm of over 50 sols would have been able to make the distinction between criminal and civil law.



Updated: Just read the tran­script­ ....excellent thank you again Youngagain

Arnie has great news.
Anybody who has been on Wikivorce pre June of this year, will be aware that Amanda is professional barrister driven by her convictions. She was prepared to state her opinions ­base­d upon the law to the wikivorce community and thus face the gauntlet of public outrage, as well as a great deal of appreciation and respect from people who had received her excellent advice, ­base­d upon their need rather than their ability to pay.
I was impressed the first time that I posted in these forums by English law at its eloquent best. I might well not agree with her, however her opinions are constrained by the laws which are determined by our politicians.
However Arnie was a bit perplexed, there didnt seem to be any other professional voices that he could verify as being professionals stating an opinion anywhere else upon the site. Lots innuendo and pseudo but Amanda seemed to be the only legal professional in the UK prepared to engage with the community.

The great news is, that as Arnie journeys to the centre of hyperspace, he discovered a second legal professional with the courage of his convictions.
Interestingly, he is a professional solicitor who is a member of Resolution.
Arnie could hardly contain his excitement when he discovered a blog post on a VERY professional blog, about a training manual costing £25 courtesy of Resolution.

This is a ­link­ to a screenshot of that exchange with the second legal professional discovered in the UK this year.

When challenged on the effectiveness of the Code of Practice he responded but I can say that enforcement of Resolution's Code of Practice is something of a moot point.
Online Dictionary definition of moot:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
–adjective
1. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: a moot point.
2. of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic.
3. Chiefly Law. not actual; theoretical; hypothetical.

The Director of Standards for Resolution essentially said that endorsement of Mr Blah Blah was on the basis that he had paid his fee.
A member of Resolution and a specialist in family Law stated that the Code of Practice enforcement policy is of little or no practical value or meaning. The very points Arnie has been making all along.

Resolution are FULLY aware of this post and should assure Everybody that their Code of Practice now has a credible and effective complaints procedure or they should publish a PROPER disclaimer.


Arnie wishes everybody a great Bank Holiday Weekend

Resolution supporting corruption in family law have infected the Tory Party conference(on the fringe)
http://tory.fringelist.com/event/cbdfac8bd5bf8ab94777453035706811

I have emailed Cameron but the Corrupt Elites stick together. Is the ANY ONE person other than a solicitor that has a good experience of this corrupt COMMERCIAL organisation