|
Sep 03
2008
|
Well, the result was not good as some of you may have gathered.
The Judge said that he was unsure as to why I had applied to extend the Non-Mol Undertakings. He said my statement seemed to refer to Contact and Finances as opposed to issues relating to Non-Molestation.
He couldn't see that my ex uses these opportunities, as well as times when he needs no contact with me, to intimidate me. He couldn't see that texts sent for no reason with no content pertaining to the children where intimidating me.
He ignored the fact that for the duration of the Undertakings my ex had ignored the content and



