|
May 23
2007
|
Two sides to every storyPosted by Dockley in new relationships, moving on, accepting its over |
This blog is written by the girlfriend of the user Dockley, just to show both sides of the coin in a world gone mad where divorce is concerned.
I divorced in 1997 with 2 small children aged 4 & 3. My ex left the home and also took entire contents with him. He stopped paying the mortgage and did not pay maintenance. I on the other hand struggled to keep my part time job, care for the kids and pay the bills. This I managed and eventually had the mortgage(debt) signed over to me. There was no equity in the house at the time. Obviously I was bitter to my ex but some of the stories I read on here just seem so wrong. We went our separate ways, me in the FMH along with the debt of it and him with no assets but able to start again. All I ever wanted was a fair outcome, no trying to take him to the cleaners, no trying to screw every penny out of him til the end of my days, no stopping the kids from seeing him just because I didnt like him anymore, just a clean break and a relationship for my children with their dad.
What I cannot understand or even empathise with are the women and men who just seem so out of control in their pursuit of making their ex pay (in more ways than one) forever and a day. Whilst I appreciate that some men have treated their wives absolutely diabolical and vice versa but when children are concerned or indeed finances, why does one party automatically feel they "deserve" more than the other and become hell bent on making them suffer. It seems that since my divorce women are on the winning streak, and I'm saying this is a divorced woman.
Now 10 years later my new partner is going through his divorce and the bitterness of his ex knows no bounds. 5 years ago he found txt messages on her phone, to cut a long story short, she admitted nothing and they started divorce. Few months later stopped divorce & got back together putting past behind them. Two years later, both agreed could not fix what was wrong and decided to split a 2nd time after 4 months of living separately in same house.
Enter new girlfriend (me) 3 months after splitting and this is where the fun starts. Since meeting she has told the kids we were together throughout their marriage, refused contact with the children in my presence, had him arrested twice on false allegations, changed the locks on the FMH which he lives in, totally tried to make the kids hate him as much as she does, removed all property from the home including his stuff, refused to attend mediation, refused to co-operate with the divorce, the list goes on and on. We are now at court stage and in debt to the tune of £4000 in solicitors and my question is this: For what? What has she gained? He will never go back to her, he will get his share of the finances, he will get his divorce, he will rebuild his realtionship with the kids, he will continue to see me...... so why all this wasted emotional and financial suffering, no one can ever be the winner in divorce.
D - Destruction
I - I hate you
V - Vile behaviour towards someone u loved so much
O - Oh i'll make you pay
R - Revenge
C - Childen? They're a weapon I can use against you
E - End of, or is it, will it ever be
I appreciate this will not be a welcome read to some of you, this is just my own personal feeling, of course each divorce is different.

DownButNotOut
said:
| May 23, 2007 | ||
|
Dougie's girlfriend, Your scenario sounds so similar to mine. My wife is out for every penny she can get. I have offered her 100% of FMH but thats not enough for her. She also refuses to let my son visit me (i live in france, they both are in UK). I met my new girlfriend a couple years ago, she found out and we separated. She is convinced that i have been in a relationship with my girlfriend for 9 years when i had only known her 5 weeks. Given that my girlfriend is 23 years old - i dunno how she figures i started dating her when she was 14!! She is totally consumed by the divorce - it has taken over her life - she doesnt work - she spends every spare minute working on the case. This is no exaggeration, the court bundle for our case is a pile of paper 3 ft high!! I have to take it with me in the plane everytime i go to UK for a hearing (of which there are many) its costs me a bomb in overweight baggage fees |
||
| Votes: +0 |
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
DownButNotOut
said:
PETAL
said:
| May 24, 2007 | ||
| Know the feeling my ex has removed all contents of the fmh worth 40k and thinks this wont be taken into account. He has never made one mortgage payment in 7 years living infmh and is still wanting half. The debts are more than the eauity value of house and instead of trying to cheaply do it via communication and letters he has gone to court costing thousands and for negative equity. All I have gained is a debt amangment plan / mortgage arrears and am living on breadline. My Mum is dying and I want to concentrate on her but still he wants to screw me over and to put the cherry on the cake I just found out my pet has cancer. Fair divorce I dont think I know of one just people trying to hurt each other more | ||
| Votes: +0 |
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
bathsheba
said:
| May 24, 2007 | ||
|
Know the feeling well. My former husband did everything in his power to prevent me from having a share of our house and did his best to make my children hate me when I told him I was divorcing him. He dragged the whole business out over two years but eventually had to concede me half the property (our only asset) which was only fair. To get to that point we both had to spend a lot of money and waste a lot of energy in anguish and worry. When one person on a marriage or a relationship wants out there is little to be gained by opposing them or by making things more difficult than they are already. Several years down the line I know that getting divorced was the best thing I ever did, my life is so much better than it ever could have been if I had remained married. When you are in the middle of a hideous divorce it is easy to lose sight of reality and become obsessed with the details instead of seeing the bigger picture and looking forward. I also agree with Dougie's girlfriend that the scales appear to have tipped too far in the favour of wives. Men often get a very raw deal out of divorce and it is a problem that needs to be addressed sensibly and sensitively to redress the balance. There is some good stuff about the position of men and divorce on a website that appears to have just gone up - mylifeafterdivorce.com. It's a really good site. It also made me laugh. A lot. |
||
| Votes: +0 |
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
Elizabeth
said:
| March 01, 2008 | ||
|
It's sad but interesting to read these posts... my ex left after 19 years - mid 40's, 3 years after a redundancy in a high earning career job, we married "late" (27) had children 7 years later (2) and after his redundancy the both children were in full time school. I went straight out and got a job which was the plan any way - he became "house-husband" - seemed ok for a while only fair after such a blow - after 3 years though it started to bite and I asked him to get a proper secure job (he did some part-time work) he refused. Started to argue - 6 months later he left - suppose I nagged him - I blamed myself. Worst thing was he said he had formed a "special bond" with our children - and promptly thought that gave him the right to take them - 300 miles away. Within a week he was on the phone bullying me to sell the house - no consideration as to what the children felt! Naturally (anyone else agree?) I dug my heels in and said not until the children arrangements were finalised - one child returned to me. I was gutted the children were split up - 300 miles apart. He stayed in the North, me in the FMH in the South. Court hearings followed - situ stayed the same. I offered him 30% of equity and he keep his large pension (built up whilst I supported him and worked part-time whilst bringing up the children) and his shares. He wanted all that and 50% equity. Is that fair? Was I being unreasonable given the property up North is a good deal cheaper than the South and he could have re-housed? Guess what - he moved back South just before the final hearing! Court ordered him 46% equity and to part with 42% of his pension - it cost us both dearly to get to this decision - could he not have been fair with his pension in the first place and saved himself a lot of money? Hence he blames ME for his solicitors bills/debt - and my son sides with him and won't see me. Yes, Divorce is as you spelt out - I don't think I was unfair but he was - how do you deal with things fairly when one side is not being so? You still get people thinking you must be doing something wrong too... Any comments would be appreciated! |
||
| Votes: +0 |
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|






