Richard, the reference to 25% is really quite dated. I've never been able
to identify where it originated from but suspect that it relates to the
fact that around 25% can be taken as a cash sum and historically only
benefits payable in the near
future were considerd.
Start point is that
CETV valuations vary quite wildly, each set of pension
scheme trustees sets the assumptions for their scheme and the initial
purpose of CETVs was nothing to do with valuation for divorce purposes. I
start by valuaing pension benefits on a basis which I use for all cases
irrespective of which side I act for.
Second point is that pension is
taxable, so the proportion paid to HMRC should be excluded.
Third
point is that, if it's a defined benefit scheme there will be a spouse's
pension, the value of which is included in the
CETV, depending on the circumstancs it may be
appropriate to exclude this.
Once you have gone through the process
above you are then in a position to consider the discount to reflect the
difference between pension benefits payable in a prescribed manner and
other more liquid assets - adjustment for utility value.
Unfortunately
there is no standard recognised methodology for allowing for differing
utility value. I have prepared some reports which inclde a valuation
allowing for utility adjustment for illustration, however I suspect that in
many cases, it comes down to negotiation and/or court deciding.
Hope
that's of use.
Ian