hi jj,
i hope anything i say from my own exsperience can aid you in
anyway ,firstly my 1st application was refused as the courts stated there
was no periodical payment set in the 1st order so ther was no grounds to
enforce or varifie of which i was applying, so the 2nd application was
worded so as to enable the court decreation ie direction seems direction
was a very powerful meaning used by the courts ,if this helps this is the
actual terms used by the court informing me my application was successful
and my hearing date set ,
IT IS ORDERED THAT
the applicants
application to vary the order dated 6th oct 09 be deemed to include also an
application for direction as to the enforcement of the respondants
undertaking contained in the order
the application be listed for
direction on the 13th dec 2011 .
also in the application i enclosed
facts of non payments for the judge to review short statement of
exsplanation and a copy of the original order with highlighted decreations
,this became my hearing the judge refered to it all through the hearing and
used it as factual evidance ,also on my application i stated on the courts
findings the
respondant recieved all costs so yes you would recieve
all return of costs incured if a liability is ordered against the
respondant ,but i did state that on my application to also be heard ,
im so sorry to hear of your dilema and i hope any of this can be of some
help but from my own exsperience i feel i wasted a lot of time and money
seeking
legal advice cos in the end i had all the
evidence and had so for a long time and legals were telling me i had no
hope ,so i bit the bull by the horn and just went for it alone and reped
myself only to have the outcome i should have done it along time sooner ,i
now have new orders and yes i have recieved my first payment before due
date and he has complied with paying the csa my full rate of child surport
of which i did have a secondary part of my liability against him set in the
new order that the order stated he could pay monthly payments of what was
owed only if he complied with future csa demands so now if he fails the csa
i can drag him back to court faster than the csa can for non payment ,his
done himself no favours cos now he pays me full csa rate on top of my
arrears and costs on top of all his solicitor costs ,i do hope ive helped
and here if i can help at all some more ,
hillary