hmm, i see what you're saying, but the reality is I don't want live down
there. all my relatives are in this area and offer a big support network -
which is one of my strongest arguments, as she has no one apart from her
crim drug-dealing bf and his mates.
i know it sounds harsh, but
it really is a battle.
my main point is that they would have a
better life with me (IMO) and go to nursery and
school with cousins and have lots!! of
family to socialise with. with her they stay in and dont socialise and she
has no means to. I really did do everything, i took them to nursery, took
them on days outs, visited family with them - she didnt.
Anyway,
thats detracting from the point.
Although it might be
understandable why she is moving, the reason the judge said to return the
kids was to maintain status quo - i believe this change of towns undermines
this, and so it should be debtated whether the kids' best interests would
be with me rather than being allowed to settle into a new home/location.
Of course I appreciate that the longer the status quo exists
the less likely the judge will want to upset it at the final hearing, so I
dont particularly want her to establish this new home as the status quo.
So does anyone have any advice/experience of this, and the best way
to deal with it?
I presume putting in an application to amend
the Court Order is right, however I'm concerned at the timescale this might
take.
I have said I am really considering holding on to the kids
past the return date until we can go to court to address the issue -
although i do understand that if my argument is lame then it will look
really bad against me in the final hearing.
but at the same time
I dont want her to establish a new status quo which will also lessen my
chances of gaining full
residence.