Research findings:
http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/hitchings-report.pdf"The purpose of this study is to provide much needed research from
a qualitative perspective into how legal professionals draft such
agreements, advise
clients and deal with existing agreements, as well
as to provide a perspective on their
views and opinions of law reform
in this area. This research report seeks to present
the law as at 31st
March 2009"
"
“Again, being in this neck of the woods, I’d
look to limit that maintenance for 5,
10 years, and you may justify
that locally. I don’t know if you’d get away with it in London. I’m sure
you wouldn’t. Your North/South divide! Spousal
maintenance is the
hardest issue in any divorce.”
INE
Although this was the only
practitioner who explicitly mentioned how the usual
approach of the
local county court would impact their advice when advising upon and
drafting a pre-nuptial agreement, a number of other practitioners
mentioned the
disparity of approach in different courts in ancillary
relief proceedings:
“We don’t really get involved in cases outside of
(local area) very often,
obviously from time to time, and that’s an
interesting one when you see how
courts round the country deal with
things. One of the interesting things is the
clean break principle. In
the (local court) of course, if you’re a woman with
children, you’re
going to get maintenance. But other courts, I remember going
down to
(other area) once to do a hearing in (different) County Court. I was
saying all this about ‘this is obviously not a clean break case’ – it was
an FDR –
and the judge said ‘actually, we do that quite a lot round
here’.”
ILD
It is therefore impossible to say with any certainty
that local county court practice and approach in ancillary relief cases
makes any notable difference to the way in which agreements up and down the
country are negotiated, but it is nevertheless a useful indication of an
additional factor that influences practitioners when drafting and advising
upon agreements."