I'd certainly support the first
petition (it's what some of us have been campaigning
for for years!), although at present the 'more suitable alternatives'
simply are not available to cater for the inevitably high demand which
would result in restricting access to the courts.
I can't
support the second
petition, however, because it completely ignores the
phenomenon of parental alienation in which the child's expressed views are
not his own but those of his parent. There are many who think that the
Children Act goes too far already in attaching importance to a child's
wishes and that the courts thereby (in Tony Coe's words) 'abdicate
responsibility to children'. In a 2005 press release F4J said, 'This
ideology promotes the worst part of the current system of family law...
This way not only can the system blame the parents for not agreeing
arrangements, they can blame the kids for choosing which parents they
wanted to live with in the first place if it all goes wrong, which it
inevitably will.'
An article in today's Times shows the dangers
of giving too much credence to a child's expressed 'wishes and feelings':
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/famil
ies/article6941434.ece