Further to Fiona’s post, Schedule 10 of the act specifies that “between a
husband and wife residing together the wife shall be entitled” and that
“between two persons residing together who are parents of the child but not
husband and wife, the mother shall be entitled.” This is one area of
family law where the legislation is openly discriminatory. When the
parents separate the allocation continues, and, as Fiona says, the benefit
is intended to be cheap to administer and so cannot be split.
Where care is shared equally the rules (Regulation 20 of the Child
Support (Maintenance and Special Cases) 1992 No. 1815) demand that one
parent must still be deemed the “absent” parent and must therefore pay
child support. Absence is therefore a legal status,
not a description of reality, a lesson the Prime Minister needs
to learn.
Other
benefits and
child support tended to follow child benefit, this was
ruled discriminatory by the court in Hockenjos v Secretary of State for
Work & Pensions, as was the
regulation that
only one parent could be responsible for a child. The court commented that
to allow a father nothing for the maintenance of the child when he shares
care virtually equally is so unfair that no reasonable secretary of state
could countenance it. Lord Justice Ward observed,
“To be forced
to treat only one [parent] as responsible where there is a shared
residence order in
operation is grotesque.
“It is degrading to fathers who actually
- and lovingly - tend to their children. A law so framed is so
far removed from reality that it brings the law into disrepute.”
The Government’s shameful response was to replace the Dependent
Children’s Allowance with Child Tax Credits in April 2004; in which the
test for eligibility is not who is in receipt of Child Benefit but with
whom the child normally lives. The European Directive 79/7/EEC which the
Government breached in the Hockenjos case does not apply to family
benefits. Sadly the
“grotesque” discrimination against fathers continues.
All I can
advise, Mwahppet, is to lobby your MP remorselessly and join the mothers
and fathers who represent the equal parenting movement.