|
Can anyone tell me a little bit more about them? i know these aren't always
the courts favourite, preferring clean breaks, but if they're the only
option left on a 'needs' case that gives priority to the child(ren), its
something I'd like to give consideration to. Can the LIP specify the
triggers applicable? Can they specify an 'amount' rather than a percentage
of the equity. I have issues with staying in a property and spending on
improving it for my ex to then reap the benefits later on a percentage
based share. I read on here the other day (fluffy76 i think) who
had a mesher of 60/40 but that the ex had to pay 50% of the mortgage in the
meantime. Is that common? I'd never heard of that before.... anyone know a
bit about these, I'd appreciate a better insight, thanks x
|