|
Can anyone tell me a little bit more about them? i know these aren't always the courts favourite, preferring clean breaks, but if they're the only option left on a 'needs' case that gives priority to the child(ren), its something I'd like to give consideration to. Can the LIP specify the triggers applicable? Can they specify an 'amount' rather than a percentage of the equity. I have issues with staying in a property and spending on improving it for my ex to then reap the benefits later on a percentage based share. I read on here the other day (fluffy76 i think) who had a mesher of 60/40 but that the ex had to pay 50% of the mortgage in the meantime. Is that common? I'd never heard of that before.... anyone know a bit about these, I'd appreciate a better insight, thanks x
|