A judge’s refusal to order shared residence because it would affect the issue of control and power between the parents was held to be unreasonable. The CA decided this was a classic case for shared residence which would reflect the reality of the situation. Court: Court Of Appeal (England and Wales)
|
48 guests and 43 members online
Divorce 
Library Categories Re P (children) (shared residence order) (CA) 09/11/05
Library Categories Re P (children) (shared residence order) (CA) 09/11/05 Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Re P (children) (shared residence order) (CA) 09/11/05
|
||||||||||||||
 |
1.0 (1) |
Feedback from Wikivorce users and customers
Feedback received from 1 customer(s).
|
To submit your feedback please register or login. |
|
Where is the detail
| Why don't is there no detail for the cases that you post. it is frustrating when your readers require more detailed information. |
|
|
|
| Fixed Price Solicitor Managed Divorce |
| was |
|
|
| Financial Settlement Clean Break Order |
| was |
|
|
| Full Divorce AND financial settlement |
| was |
|
|
| Most Viewed |
|---|
![D v D (Shared Residence Order) [2001] 1 FLR 495](http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/images/stories/jreviews/tn/tn_4199_module50_6071_150px-UK_Royal_Coat_of_Arms.svg_1241433526.png)
![R (Children) [2005] EWCA Civ 542](http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/images/stories/jreviews/tn/tn_4204_module50_6071_150px-UK_Royal_Coat_of_Arms.svg_1241433526.png)
