A judge hearing an application to discharge a care order under s.39 did not have the jurisdiction if he decided to discharge it to substitute an interim care order. S.39 (4) clearly defines and limits the courts jurisdiction such that a supervision order is the only order that can be substituted for a care order. Court: Court Of Appeal (England and Wales)
|
47 guests and 42 members online
Divorce 
Library Categories Re C (a child) (care order: application to discharge) (CA) 11/11/05
Library Categories Re C (a child) (care order: application to discharge) (CA) 11/11/05 Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Re C (a child) (care order: application to discharge) (CA) 11/11/05
|
||||||
 |
0.0 (0) |
Feedback from Wikivorce users and customers
|
There are no user reviews for this listing. To submit your feedback please register or login. |
|
|
| Fixed Price Solicitor Managed Divorce |
| was |
|
|
| Financial Settlement Clean Break Order |
| was |
|
|
| Full Divorce AND financial settlement |
| was |
|
|
| Most Viewed |
|---|
![D v D (Shared Residence Order) [2001] 1 FLR 495](http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/images/stories/jreviews/tn/tn_4199_module50_6071_150px-UK_Royal_Coat_of_Arms.svg_1241433526.png)
![R (Children) [2005] EWCA Civ 542](http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/images/stories/jreviews/tn/tn_4204_module50_6071_150px-UK_Royal_Coat_of_Arms.svg_1241433526.png)
