In refusing the appeal of a father who enjoyed contact with his child for a few hours a week before the mother moved to England CA held that the liberal New Zealand interpretation of ‘rights of custody’ was wrong and that there was no foundation to support the father’s contention that a positive determination (Art 15) by New Zealand was determinative.Court:
Court Of Appeal (England and Wales)



![Hunter v Murrow [2005] EWCA Civ 976 (28 July 2005)](http://www.wikivorce.com/divorce/images/stories/jreviews/tn/tn_6074_150px-UK_Royal_Coat_of_Arms.svg_1241433919.png)





